Skip to main content

Rhino Mocks Caveat: Expect.Call / Setup.For / Stubs and Defaults

I got bitten by not knowing some Rhino Mocks API details today. I had some tests written a certain way which were passing and some others written the same way which were failing. (Code can be found here.) In the case of the successful tests, Rhino Mocks appeared to be properly returning a mock object when a property was called on another mock, and in the case of the failing tests it was returning nulls for the property on a mocked object. There didn’t appear to be any difference in the way I needed to declare and setup the mocks used in the test, but there was a subtle one: the code that passed the tests only accessed the property once, whereas the code that failed accessed it multiple times. Because of the way I set up my mocks, a mock was returned for the property the first time it was accessed only.

If you use Expect.Call(…).Return(someObject), by default the method/property will only return the specified object once. If you use a stub or SetupResult.For(…).Return(someObject), by default the method/property will return the specified object as many times as it is called.

Since I prefer the consistency of using Expect.Call for any kind of expectation (and I think it reads better), I used Expect.Call(…).Return(someObject).Repeat.Any() to allow the property to return what I wanted every time it was called.

File this under the importance of defaults.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Enabling Globalization Invariant Mode for .NET Core App on Raspberry Pi Running LibreElec

I had an app I wanted to run on my Raspberry Pi 3 running LibreElec . In LibreElec you can install the dotnet core 2.2 runtime as an addon, and in Visual Studio you can compile for ARM processors with ‘Target Runtime’ set to ‘linux-arm’ in the publish profile. So, I published to a folder from VS using that profile, and I copied the output over to my RPi which had the dotnet runtime installed. I did a simple dotnet Whatever.dll to run the app (actually in this case, it was /storage/.kodi/addons/tools.dotnet-runtime/bin/dotnet Whatever.dll because of the way the addon is installed) and was met with this error: FailFast: Couldn't find a valid ICU package installed on the system. Set the configuration flag System.Globalization.Invariant to true if you want to run with no globalization support. at System.Environment.FailFast(System.String) at System.Globalization.GlobalizationMode.GetGlobalizationInvariantMode() at System.Globalization.GlobalizationMode..cctor() at Syste

Migrating Hg Repos with hg-fast-export and Windows Subsystem for Linux

Introduction I prefer Mercurial (hg) to git . I don’t really have any reason for this preference - they both do the same thing, and the user experience for 90% of the use cases is the same. It probably comes from the conditions of the DVCS landscape when I started using these systems. Some of this may have been perception only, but it looked like this: GitHub didn’t have free private repos BitBucket did have free private repos BitBucket was very hg-friendly Joel Spolsky had an amazing tutorial that served as both a how-to for hg as well as a general intro to DVCS hg was much more Windows-friendly than git Since hg was written in python, I felt like extending it would be easier than doing so for git if I ever needed to (admittedly, this is a pretty ridiculous reason) hg felt like a more unified, “coherent” system than the very linux-y feeling git and its extensions (also pretty ridiculous) Where they differed, I liked the verbs hg used better than git’s counterparts

Serializing Anonymous Methods

I’m taking some time off from not blogging to do a little blogging. I hope this doesn’t inconvenience absolutely nobody. I was doing some [binary] serialization work recently when I came across a problem – I wanted to serialize objects with delegate fields that were populated with anonymous methods at runtime. To wit, I had types like this: public delegate void MakeMove(); public class AdrianPeterson { public int GameOneYards { get; set; } public Football Ball { get; set; } public MakeMove Move { get; set; } } Populated like this: var explicitDirections = new List<string> { "left", "right", "left" }; var ap = new AdrianPeterson(); var apName = ap.GetType().Name; ap.GameOneYards = 87; ap.Move = () => Moves.Weave(apName, explicitDirections); So, I pop a [ Serializable ] on AdrianPeterson (and Football ), and I’m set, right? Wrong. Wrong like getting away from running AP in the second half when the only receiving threat you have is bei